Need Additional Information
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    teams Action Research drexler sibbet team building collaboration meetings LIFO meeting facilitation team development trust facilitation the hive clickers innovation team learning team performance Town Hall Meeting audience response brainstorming change management conflict debate democracy design dialogue engagement GSA iPad meeting design participation particpatory process resistance Robert Fritz supportive confrontation surveys team startup truth aikido America Speaks android appreciative inquiry books boondoggle boring bosses brainstoming breinstorming byod celebration checklists civil discourse clinch Clinton conference calls confrontation consensus consulting contracting ddrexler sibbet differences disclosure effort element b empathy Face Time facilitaion feedback fight / flight firefighting firo flyfishing framing Gary Hammel geocaching GHW Bush Grace Period group dynamics group think GTD high performance iMovie iMovie 11" inclusion innovaton interactivity interdependence intervention intimacy intuition iPhone app Jack Gibb johari window kickoff Life Orientations macinstosh Martin Luther King Day membership mindmapping mission critical models mojo murphy's law NCDD negotiations norms off-sites open source organization design organizational effectiveness oscillation Owen J Roberts Paperless meetings passion peace pre-load preparation presentation priorities process intervention productivity public meetings raising issues redirecting relationship Robert Sutton schrivner screencastsonline screenplay structure self reflection sequencing Shutz skits Skype smart rooms storage story editing stratey structural consulting style feedback team calls team perromance teambuilding telephony The Human Element The Schutz Company town hall preparation treking Turning Technolgies video vision wisdom of group women
    « Critical / Compatible using The Hive | Main | Confrontation Issues in Groups / Teams »
    Wednesday
    Dec082010

    Going Deep with Clickers (supportive confrontation)

    A number of times, I use clickers with with The Hive to achieve a fast feedback system that I cannot get with a single application. Clickers allow us to vote quickly on any topic and they make collecting critical pieces of data easy and fun. Let me give an example of going deep with them.


    Suppose your client, a large team of 30, wants to increase trust, and suppose further that they already know they have a number of issues that need to be worked, but are unwilling to discuss them openly. It’s a very common problem.


    One way to get at what needs to be worked is to use clickers with a bit of Action Research. Here’s our method. Kids, don’t try this at home without a real facilitator present.


    Identify the working sub-teams of the large team. For example in a large financial team you might have these subgroups. IT, Treasury, HR, Tax, Finance, and ER (enterprise risk).


    Make the following table:

    Notice that each of the intersections can describe the relationship between each of the sub teams. The interaction of HR Enterprise Risk and Tax offers two dimensions Critical and Compatible. The questions would be: How CRITICAL is it for Enterprise Risk and Tax to work well together on this team. We could score this by means of a 1-7 Likert scale, where 1 - not critical and all and 7 means essential for the well being of the team.


    Next we could measure how COMPATIBLE they are in practice. How well do they actually get along.? Get along has the connotation of trust in action.


    Now, what’s interesting is that everyone on the team knows everything about these dimensions for each of the combinations. They have not had an easy way to see it, or to discuss this openly. When you load this into the clickers, you have a powerful design that in the capturing of the information and in ensuing discussion.

    The clickers capture the information instantly and anonymously. It take about 10 minutes to collect all the data. The discussion is rich, and can lead to significant breakthroughs. For example there may be hot spots in the team where Critical is scored high, and Compatibility is scored low. This is worth discussing. There may also be places where a sub team flat lines, that is they are not seen as critical even though they feel they are. Again, this is worth discussing.


    Clickers can add a new dimension to your consulting work. Action Research in the moment. Can’t help to think that Kurt Lewin would have loved to play with these in action!

    Giving Credit: I learned this technique from Will Schutz a long time ago. He was a genius at designing powerful, supportive confrontations that move groups to productive dialogue.

    PrintView Printer Friendly Version

    EmailEmail Article to Friend

    Reader Comments

    There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    Post:
     
    Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>